Hospital Discount Center City Philadelphia for Cancer Patient Families

Y'all know about how individuals proceeds control of the power of the State and then abuse that power like erstwhile US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some U.s.a. businesses.  He accomplished this b y challenge Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the state of war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Recall how Bush was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the United states with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist only which Blair claimed could be deployed within forty minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Observe how they persuade the states we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The issue cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself non to accept:

Small Pox – Large Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was particularly the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading illness: London'south first park built later rich feared disease spread from slums Great britain The Independent Past Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The heart and upper classes needed to be reassured the Land would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this past ensuring the and so truly "great unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the illness itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you tin can read a relatively short only well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells united states. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the turn down in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Urban center of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Great britain)	1860-1908	one,355	96	seven.1
British Army (Bharat)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
One thousand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upward vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparing, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and then that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Regal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—only on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	ix,659	i,594	16.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to utilise the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its first. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an effort to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a elementary tale of the origin of vaccination. Most nowadays the aforementioned bones tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country physician and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or every bit information technology was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an 8-twelvemonth sometime boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'due south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps'southward hands. The male child came down with a slight fever, but zero more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once again; once more, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner'south idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to every bit cowpoxing, but somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. Every bit the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non different the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, peculiarly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the futurity.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded past the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but there was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a event.[4,v] Still, this was an comeback compared to a xx-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[half-dozen] Merely, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation solitary? Or could information technology have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more nutritious nutrient and a cleaner surround than the majority of society?

At that place was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than in that location would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious illness and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later on, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because information technology caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to finish the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise accept been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural manner; these centers of contamination are evidently multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

Withal, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by virtually of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect 1 from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took illness matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He afterwards deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to meet if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Order, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-size-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the commencement there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by beingness inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results considering they were not in back up of his theory.[nine]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to cover Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were however dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the yr 1799. A month later it was inoculated with pocket-size-pox matter without outcome, and a few months subsequently took confluent pocket-size-pox and died. ii. A woman-retainer to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual manner from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. iii and four. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summertime of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-size-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'due south name was concealed. fourteen. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'southward function . . . died of small-pox a year later on vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-scale-pox later on vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit every bit smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Minor Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the most skilful practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brownish, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no ane in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Simply after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later on vaccination, people still could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend it every bit a new form of income. It is therefore quite pregnant for a physician to have spoken out against information technology every bit Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could all the same infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could likewise be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, one, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a swell hubbub almost the small-pox. Information technology broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed close to dwelling to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had small-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lonely, simply barbarous upon cracking numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote near the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real pocket-size-pox later on, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" form, which meant that fabric was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination connected for decades, but equally failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed dominance, and there were calls to obtain fresh textile directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner really believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was but smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new illness.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a cow'southward udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not simply was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but at that place were too reports of deaths from other causes presently after vaccination. For example, a peel condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful mode to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, aged v years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two expert cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas later vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what information technology was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial organization intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nil to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, in that location were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the bang-up 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, at that place were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-sixty, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to impale or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of police created the perfect surroundings that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get well-nigh a quarter million. Other sums, as well, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Even so, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three 1000 4 hundred and 60-nine cases of pocket-sized-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-two pocket-sized-pox patients in London hospitals, half-dozen thousand eight hundred and 50-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than than one hundred and twenty-ii thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine condom, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the regime and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the slap-up demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an center-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a neat manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated past a crucial test of an experience extending over a menstruum of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to modest-pox and far less affected by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when 90-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted equally a safe procedure, information technology often caused sickness or even decease. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than than one,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph iv).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph four: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox changed its grapheme. After the summer of 1897, the astringent blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the Us. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in l and later on to equally low equally 1 in 380. The illness could still kill, but having become so much milder, it was oftentimes mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The bloodshed was very depression and information technology [smallpox] was usually at offset mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease charge per unit was effectually xx%, as information technology had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit brutal off speedily, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. As the balmy grade of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced trivial in the fashion of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the U.s.a. in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be betwixt ane in twenty,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to xl%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were non reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this event of vaccination. In that location were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the upshot of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned fourth dimension at that place had only been 1 smallpox expiry in 1948.[36]

The terminal smallpox decease in the The states following an importation occurred in 1948, merely since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military father after the begetter was vaccinated. Afterwards a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually accept been even higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modernistic health-care system, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire earth?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and maybe agape that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted style to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. One thousand. Oliphant, One thousand.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acerb acrid in ruddy fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit practical to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more than reliable as a prophylactic in pocket-sized-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, subsequently breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those under ordinary handling the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe too demonstrated vinegar'southward power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a solar day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Guild, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century by take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed demand have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as airtight, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem giddy, but simply because most people have been conditioned to take the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, illness-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, basic, and claret vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the trunk is not able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve equally mortar belongings cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of King's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the nearly intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Golden Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in boxing.[44] For example, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy straight accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died every bit a outcome of their wounds accounted only for ane per centum of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known every bit pertussis) all profoundly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & six).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to exist echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine organized religion. But the truthful history shows united states a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an affliction. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage retentiveness. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's not bad discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, exercise more and more vaccines seem similar a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'south volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can be plant on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
vii."The Exercise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'south Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
ix.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
eighteen.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Md, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the The states," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Forenoon Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. four, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, Apr 1911, vol. nineteen, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Yard. W. Harman, Doc, "A Physician'southward Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Doctor, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Affliction," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Minor-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, Westward.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
xl."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. i, no. ane, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Preclude Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Half-dozen, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, Jan 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

dysartbegue1972.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post